Market Reality Check: IPhone Air And 16e Sales Collapse Triggers Industry Shift

, 16 Nov 2025

    Share:
Author: Dary Hamidudin
Apple faces a significant challenge as sales for its iPhone Air and iPhone 16e models dramatically underperform, forcing production halts and altering industry-wide development roadmaps. (Adi Fida Rahman/detikINET)

Taipei, Taiwan - The global smartphone supply chain, often a silent barometer of product success, is broadcasting clear signals of trouble for Apple's recent launches. According to multiple reports from industry analysts and supply chain sources, both the iPhone 16e and the aesthetically daring iPhone Air have encountered such tepid demand that Apple has been compelled to enact deep and swift production reductions. This sales collapse is not only a problem for Apple but is also causing a domino effect, halting ambitious projects at competing smartphone firms.

The iPhone Air's journey from launch to slowdown has been remarkably brief. Despite its status as the thinnest iPhone ever, consumer interest has not translated into sustained sales. Investment firm analyses note that Apple slashed its production plan for the iPhone Air by half just weeks after launch, with actual sales tracking at roughly a third of the company's most optimistic projections. The manufacturing fallout has been severe, with key production lines already shuttered and component orders for long-lead parts scheduled for termination by year's end.

A consensus among reviewers and potential buyers is that the iPhone Air's compromises are too great for its price. The pursuit of a 5.6mm profile necessitated a single-lens camera system, omitting popular features like ultra-wide photography, and a battery that is small by contemporary standards. When combined with a starting price perilously close to the superior iPhone 17 Pro, the value equation breaks down for most consumers. This sentiment is quantifiable in the aftermarket, where the Air's value retention is the worst in recent iPhone history.

The iPhone 16e's story is one of muted impact. As a device that leveraged Apple's new in-house 5G modem technology, its strategic importance for component independence was clear. However, its appeal to consumers was less obvious, resulting in lackluster sales that contributed to the overall iPhone 16 series requiring promotional discounts earlier in its lifecycle than usual to clear inventory. Its performance underscores the difficulty of competing in the crowded mid-range segment.

The ripple effects are perhaps most striking in the actions of Apple's competitors. Observing the market's rejection of the ultra-thin, high-compromise iPhone Air, Chinese smartphone giants have proactively halted their own parallel development programs. Companies including Xiaomi, OPPO, and Vivo have reportedly frozen projects intended to create rival "Air"-style devices, reassigning engineering resources to what they perceive as safer product categories. One failed launch has effectively stifled an emerging design trend.

In response to the market feedback, Apple is reportedly reevaluating the iPhone Air's fundamental design. The planned successor model has been delayed, with the extra time being used to potentially reconfigure the device to address its most criticized shortcomings, particularly its single-camera setup and battery life. This represents a significant course correction initiated by poor sales data.

Beyond immediate commerce, there is a school of thought that views these products as strategic probes. The iPhone 16e allowed Apple to field-test its proprietary cellular modem in a lower-stakes product, while the Air explores the limits of materials and miniaturization—knowledge that could be invaluable for future categories like foldable phones. In this context, their market performance, while poor, may still yield valuable long-term dividends.

The tale of the iPhone 16e and iPhone Air is ultimately a case study in the limits of brand power and design-led innovation. It demonstrates that when a product's functional trade-offs are perceived to outweigh its aesthetic or experimental benefits, even Apple cannot convince the market. The industry is now watching to see how quickly and effectively the company can pivot from this stumble.

(Dary Hamidudin)

Read Too: Geological Awakening: Scientists Probe Why Ethiopia's Mount Jiro Erupted After 12,000 Years

    Share:

We would appreciate your comments
Comments are your responsibility according to the ITE Law.